Cytoskeleton Dynamics

What are actin pedestals?

Actin pedestals are raised actin structures formed by the dynamic polymerization of host actin, induced by effector proteins secreted by extracellular pathogens like Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) and Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC).

Infection by EPEC and EHEC induce attaching and effacing (A/E) lesions on the intestinal epithelia causing destruction of nearby microvilli. EPEC and EHEC have developed antiphagocytic mechanisms that prevent their uptake into the host cell. This is mediated by the bacterial virulence effector EspG. EspG blocks actin polymerization regulated by the WAVE regulatory complex (WRC) through its interaction with either Arf6 or Arf1, eventually preventing Rac1 activation, WRC recruitment and actin polymerization [1]. While EPEC and EHEC block actin polymerization related to phagocytosis, interestingly they invoke actin polymerization at the site of their attachment to the host cell resulting in actin dense structures, providing an intimate host-pathogen interaction referred to as actin pedestals [2] [3].

Mechanism of actin pedestal formation

EPEC and EHEC employ Type III secretion systems (T3SS) to inject translocated intimin receptor, Tir, into the host. Tir has a loop-like structure and inserts itself into the host plasma membrane with both the C- and N-termini facing the cytoplasm. The loop region is exposed to the extracellular space and binds the bacterial A/E protein intimin [4]. The interaction between Tir and intimin anchors the bacterium to the host membrane. The downstream pathway driving actin polymerization is unique for EPEC and EHEC. In EPEC, the tyrosine residue (Y474) at the C-terminal tail of Tir is phosphorylated by host kinases Fyn and Abl , resulting in the recruitment of the host adaptor protein Nck that binds directly to Tir [5], [6]. Nck then recruits the host actin nucleation promoting factor N-WASP, which in turn activates the Arp2/3 complex resulting in actin polymerization.

In EHEC, the Tir tyrosine phosphorylation step is bypassed by EHEC effector protein EspFu. EspFu binds the host membrane remodeling proteins IRTKS and IRSp53 that enable its binding to the Tir receptor [7] [Reviewed in [8]. Signaling is then initiated from the Asn-Pro-Tyr motif at the C-terminus of Tir, which recruits N-WASP and Arp2/3 required for actin polymerization. Apart from actin and actin-associated proteins, focal adhesion proteins (talin, vinculin, alpha-actinin, etc) are also localized at the pedestal sites [9] [10] [11]. The pedestal is similar to adhesion structures like focal adhesions, podosomes or filopodia in mammals. The similarities between actin dense structures in bacteria and mammals will provide insight into force generation from cytoskeletal organization, cellular motility as well as pathogenesis.

Actin pedestal formation by EPEC and EHEC follows injection of Tir into the host by the bacterial T3SS. Tir translocates to the host membrane. Bacterial adhesion protein intimin binds the loop region of Tir that projects into the extracellular space, thus anchoring the bacteria firmly onto the host cell. The N and C termini of Tir facing host cytoplasm invokes actin phosphorylation through distinct mechanisms in EPEC and EHEC. A. NIH3T3 cell infected with GFP-EPEC. Red- Host actin. Image is taken 5 hours post infection. Image captured by Mrinal Shah of Linda Kenney lab, MBI. B. Actin pedestal formation in EPEC is mediated by the phosphorylation of Tyr474, recruitment of Nck, N-WASP and Arp2/3. C. In EHEC, the dimeric IRSp53 protein binds the Tir and recruits bacterial EspFu.

References

  1. Humphreys D, Singh V, and Koronakis V. Inhibition of WAVE Regulatory Complex Activation by a Bacterial Virulence Effector Counteracts Pathogen Phagocytosis. Cell Rep 2016; 17(3):697-707. [PMID: 27732847]
  2. Knutton S, Baldwin T, Williams PH, and McNeish AS. Actin accumulation at sites of bacterial adhesion to tissue culture cells: basis of a new diagnostic test for enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Infect. Immun. 1989; 57(4):1290-8. [PMID: 2647635]
  3. Ross NT, and Miller BL. Characterization of the binding surface of the translocated intimin receptor, an essential protein for EPEC and EHEC cell adhesion. Protein Sci. 2007; 16(12):2677-83. [PMID: 18029421]
  4. Luo Y, Frey EA, Pfuetzner RA, Creagh AL, Knoechel DG, Haynes CA, Finlay BB, and Strynadka NC. Crystal structure of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli intimin-receptor complex. Nature 2000; 405(6790):1073-7. [PMID: 10890451]
  5. Kenny B, DeVinney R, Stein M, Reinscheid DJ, Frey EA, and Finlay BB. Enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) transfers its receptor for intimate adherence into mammalian cells. Cell 1997; 91(4):511-20. [PMID: 9390560]
  6. Kenny B, and Finlay BB. Intimin-dependent binding of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli to host cells triggers novel signaling events, including tyrosine phosphorylation of phospholipase C-gamma1. Infect. Immun. 1997; 65(7):2528-36. [PMID: 9199415]
  7. de Groot JC, Schlüter K, Carius Y, Quedenau C, Vingadassalom D, Faix J, Weiss SM, Reichelt J, Standfuss-Gabisch C, Lesser CF, Leong JM, Heinz DW, Büssow K, and Stradal TEB. Structural basis for complex formation between human IRSp53 and the translocated intimin receptor Tir of enterohemorrhagic E. coli. Structure 2011; 19(9):1294-306. [PMID: 21893288]
  8. Asrat S, de Jesús DA, Hempstead AD, Ramabhadran V, and Isberg RR. Bacterial pathogen manipulation of host membrane trafficking. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2014; 30:79-109. [PMID: 25103867]
  9. Cantarelli VV, Takahashi A, Yanagihara I, Akeda Y, Imura K, Kodama T, Kono G, Sato Y, and Honda T. Talin, a host cell protein, interacts directly with the translocated intimin receptor, Tir, of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli, and is essential for pedestal formation. Cell. Microbiol. 2001; 3(11):745-51. [PMID: 11696034]
  10. Freeman NL, Zurawski DV, Chowrashi P, Ayoob JC, Huang L, Mittal B, Sanger JM, and Sanger JW. Interaction of the enteropathogenic Escherichia coli protein, translocated intimin receptor (Tir), with focal adhesion proteins. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 2000; 47(4):307-18. [PMID: 11093251]
  11. Goosney DL, DeVinney R, Pfuetzner RA, Frey EA, Strynadka NC, and Finlay BB. Enteropathogenic E. coli translocated intimin receptor, Tir, interacts directly with alpha-actinin. Curr. Biol. 2000; 10(12):735-8. [PMID: 10873808]
By |2024-03-07T16:20:06+08:00Nov 30th, 2023|Categories: Cytoskeleton Dynamics, MBInfo|Comments Off on What are actin pedestals?

About the National University of Singapore

About NUSA leading global university centred in Asia, NUS is Singapore's flagship university, offering a global approach to education and research with a focus on Asian perspectives and expertise.

About the Mechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore

About MBIOne of four Research Centres of Excellence at NUS, MBI is working to identify, measure and describe how the forces for motility and morphogenesis are expressed at the molecular, cellular and tissue level.
Go to Top